26 pages • 52 minutes read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Kant first defines enlightenment (Aufklärung in German) in a negative manner, as a state of no longer being immature. The positive definition, then, is that enlightenment is a state of full human development in which people decide what to do and what to believe based on reason rather than outside authority; it is a form of Thinking for Oneself. Kant’s main concern in “What Is Enlightenment?” is with the enlightened public rather than with individuals, so enlightenment here is the public’s capacity to think for itself and to self-govern.
Kant’s conception of freedom is much narrower than the contemporary understanding of freedom as the absence of constraints on one’s actions. Simply being able to do whatever one wants would actually not be freedom from Kant’s perspective, as it would involve being a servant to one’s inclinations, desires, and impulses rather than being one’s own master. For Kant, freedom is autonomy in the sense that derives from the word’s Greek origins: giving the law to oneself. Furthermore, while Kant argues for free thought and expression in “What Is Enlightenment?”—i.e., Freedom of the Pen—he accepts many restrictions on the freedom of private citizens.
The German term Kant uses here is Unmündigkeit, which means basically “non-adulthood” and is sometimes translated as “tutelage”—i.e., the state of still being a student. The implication is that until people stop relying on external authorities to tell them what to do, what to believe, and how to live their lives, they have not fully developed into the adults that they could be. Kant sees the fully developed human as rational and autonomous, and the project of enlightenment is to achieve this state and to leave self-imposed immaturity behind.
Kant uses the term scholar not to designate a specific job but to represent a position that anyone can in theory hold: that of public reasoner. While people may have far-flung backgrounds and occupations, all are rational agents capable of acting as scholars by entering into public discourse—making claims and presenting arguments for them to the reading public. Kant’s description of the scholar refers to potential members of the public square, or what contemporary readers might call the marketplace of ideas.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Immanuel Kant