39 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
One of the core themes that Lerner explores is how notions of masculinity—in particular, toxic masculinity—impact both men and women. Toxic masculinity, a term that gained popularity in the 2010s, refers to the damaging effects of traditional notions of masculinity. Lerner presents such masculinity as socially constructed, rather than an innate attribute of men. Topeka’s White teens are “the lost boys of privilege” (55). They and adult male characters straddle the gulf between the stereotypical American notion of the rugged man (epitomized by the mythology of the cowboy) and the listlessness of suburban life.
Socially enforced masculinity alters the lives of Adam, Darren, Jonathan, and Jane. Each of the male characters is hyperaware of what society expects of them as men; each seeks to either distance himself from it or embody it. The disabled Darren has the fewest qualms about traditional gender roles, particularly since he is often made to feel his difference from other men through his schoolmates’ incessant bullying. He has created a “survivalist mythology” for himself (150), imagining that he’d be uniquely capable of weathering a post-apocalyptic disaster; this magical thinking allows his to indulge his violent impulses while feeling that outside forces are responsible for them. Jonathan compensates for his failure of ambition—a deviation from “hunter” masculinity stereotypes—by indulging in sexual transgressions. Although Jonathan feels guilt over his actions, he feels incapable of stopping himself from acting on his impulses, just like Darren. Adam, in contrast, struggles to distance himself from the typical masculinity he sees in his schoolmates, local political figures, and his grandfather. Yet, Adam still often enacts the same misogyny to find social acceptance, rapping misogynistic language, sizing up a male rival at the grocery store, and aggressively arguing with another father on the playground.
While toxic masculinity affects the female figures in the book through violence. Sometimes this violence is verbal, as in the threatening phone calls that Jane receives from “the Men” (89), and protests of the Westboro Church. It can also be intensely physical, as in Jane’s sexual abuse at the hands of her father, and Darren throwing a cue ball at Mandy Owens, permanently damaging her jaw and her ability to speak.
Though the novel’s setting is explicitly Topeka, Kansas, Lerner extrapolates its descriptions of the suburban landscape and the highways that surround it to other American cities and suburbs of similar size and composition. These descriptions emphasize the homogeneity of the suburban environment, in turn becoming symbolic of the overall homogeneity of American life.
The American landscape in the novel is an endless repetition of similar buildings. When Darren walks back to Topeka after being abandoned by a lake, he perceives his surroundings as a repeating loop. He recalls similar feelings on road trips, “waking every sixty miles or so to see the same strip of restaurants, gas stations, and hotels, the sense that whenever they pulled off the highway they were in the town they had just left” (153-54). Though the town names may differ, they are identical versions of American suburban sprawl. The lack of distinct landmarks and the repetition of chain restaurants and gas stations makes Darren get lost, mistaking the city of Lawrence for Topeka.
Adam experiences a similar thing, on a smaller scale. Owing to the similarity of American homes, he enters the home of a stranger that he mistakes for his girlfriend’s house. Adam feels “the sublime of identical layouts,” and imagines how America is just an endless repetition of the same: “if you opened any of the giant stainless-steel refrigerators or surveyed the faux-marble islands, you would encounter matching, modular products in slightly different configurations” (10). The similarity of aesthetics in American homes also leads to a homogeneity of ways of living and thinking. Just as most homes in America are identical, so too are the people who inhabit them.
The Topeka School considers how the usage of language in American politics and society has fundamentally altered in the 1990s and the 21st century. Lerner depicts this change as a breakdown, in which language has separated from meaning; style is more important than the content.
Lerner explores the theme through American high school debate, which he presents as roughly analogous to American culture at large. Particularly questionable is the importance of spread—student debaters rapidly firing off evidence in support of their arguments, aiming not quality of reason but simply for quantity of unverified and unverifiable data. The novel suggests that the spread is not merely an idiosyncratic debating practice, but rather a newly common means of using language throughout American culture. Some examples the novel offers of spread are obfuscations employed by “corporate persons” (24), the “fine print,” and the “list of rules and caveats read rapid-fire at the end of promotions on the radio” (24). Experts and other figures of authority frequently use the technique of the spread to confuse or placate ordinary Americans by reading off more evidence than they could possibly comprehend.
Lincoln-Douglass Debate (L-D) and extemporaneous speaking (extemp) are ostensibly safe from the spread, since both focus less on evidence. In L-D, for instance, individuals argue for moral positions, which “eliminat[es] the tubs of evidence and encourage[es] competitors and judges to focus on delivery” (136). Extemp, meanwhile, values the aesthetics of public speaking and quick-wittedness. For Adam, however, these forms are two sides of the same coin: “the supposedly disinterested policy wonks debate […] in a jargon designed to be inaccessible to the uninitiated while the more presidential speakers test out plainspoken value claims on civilians” (137). Jane describes this phenomenon as “the regimes of meaning collaps[ing] into the spread” (226). The division between the jargon-heavy language used by lobbyists and the clear but empty communication-style employed by politicians has led to language becoming divorced from meaning.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: