logo

40 pages 1 hour read

The Palace Thief

Fiction | Short Story Collection | Adult | Published in 1994

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

Baseball

Baseball is a prominent motif in “Accountant” and “City of Broken Hearts,” two stories that set up conventional portraits of heterosexual masculinity. In “Accountant,” baseball is the basis of the inequality between the otherwise “interchangeable” Abba Roth and Eugene Peters. In their youth, Roth “played third base and Eugene, whose father had gone to Notre Dame with our coach, played shortstop” (3). The latter is considered a more challenging position than the former, so Roth, as the better athlete, felt slighted. Here, Peters’s family connections, rather than his sporting qualities, automatically put him ahead. Perhaps later in the story when, at the fantasy baseball camp, Roth tries to “remember if our childhood contained some hint of our futures” (55), this is the clue that Peters would always have a natural advantage.

At the fantasy baseball camp, where the men can play with retired Giants and enact their boyhood dreams, Roth excels in his sporting activities, whereas Peters gives an average performance. However, Peters is awarded the accolade of Most Valuable Player because of his superior social skills and status; Willie Mays comments, “Seeing as he wants to be in my shoes so much […] these leggings are for him—Mr. Eugene Peters” (49). Arguably, Peters, who perennially wears a baseball cap, is already in Mays’s shoes, as he uses commercials to create a strong association between his auto-parts company and the popular hobby of baseball. Roth has the impression that Mays and Peters could become interchangeable themselves and that “no doubt” he “would soon be seeing [Mays] in a television commercial for automobile parts” (49).

In “City of Broken Hearts,” baseball is less about status than it is about nostalgia and a wish to return to a glorious past. While the story’s title relates to Wilson’s personal romantic heartbreak, more generally it references the terminally broken hearts of Boston’s baseball fans, given the decades of poor performance from their local team, the Red Sox. Wilson, who watches baseball from the sidelines, associates the quality of the game play with the two prominent periods in his life: when he was happy and stable in his young, nuclear family and when his family circumstances changed for the worse. Most notably, he conflates the Red Sox’s decline with his waning relationship with Brent:

At Fenway Park he’d watched the Red Sox since the days he had to carry his son, Brent, in his arms. Those were the days when Carl Yastrzemski was still making his day in the majors, a bird-legged lefty with a funny swing; now Yastrzemski […] had retired, and Brent was about to start his senior year in college (119).

The days of delicately built Yastrzemski’s ascendence, along with Brent’s infancy, give an impression of optimism and hopefulness in Wilson’s life. Conversely, the present, when the sportsman’s short career is over and Brent is independent, is a time of decline and hopelessness. Still, because going to Fenway Park is the only pastime that engages a lonely, depressed Wilson in his post-divorce life, he continues going to each “doomed” game, feeling the same “disappointment” every time the Red Sox lose (151). Arguably, Wilson’s compulsion to watch variants of the same losing game is symbolic of his inability to let go of the past. 

War

While none of the stories take place in a military setting, each one makes reference to characters’ spells in military institutions or armed conflict. In a collection that focuses on the personal battles in men’s lives, the shadow of war symbolizes how men are trained for conflict and the destruction of forces they label as undesirable or other.

Simon in “Batorsag and Szerelem” was a World War II marine who served in the Pacific. However, in the story’s setting, he denounces his military past and becomes a peace-loving Quaker. Still, his martial shadow is evident in his labelling of William as a fellow “sailor” and Clive as “not a sailor” (106), which he uses to indicate the stark difference in his sons’ sexualities. Simon’s violent lashing out upon discovering Clive’s relationship with Elliot reveals that the father was only wearing the trimmings of pacifism. In truth, he still bears the impulse to destroy that which threatens his values.

Wilson, the most overtly macho of the protagonists, calls upon his military experiences in the Korean War in two instances. Firstly, when he unleashes a physical attack on Tad, the man who stole his wife, he notes that he “hadn’t punched anyone since his army days” (131) and draws upon the legitimate, masculine-gendered emotions of anger and defensiveness to stand up for himself. When Wilson is confronted with feelings of sadness and grief that he does not want to dwell on, he draws upon a “trick his sergeant had taught him on the Korean peninsula” (131), which involves naming the state capitals in alphabetical order to enter a numb state and regain control. This measure proves self-defeating and delays his grieving process because the feelings gain strength every time they are repressed.

Roth, who styles himself as a company man, appears to repress his service in the Korean War from his personal history until the fantasy baseball camp, when “the light and the long vista onto the grass reminded [him] of Fort Bragg, where [he] had spent a few months at the end of the Korean War” (53). Arguably, the flashing memory of military training indicates that Roth feels at war with Peters and that there are unknown aspects of Roth’s character that the reader will never discover.

Finally, Hundert was excused from enlistment because of his myopia, and this lack of a traditionally masculine experience cements him as a man of thought rather than one of action. Nevertheless, he remains capable of inflicting the kind of hurtful “childhood slights” (210) that his students carry throughout their lives. For example, Martin Blythe, the studious boy who was bumped from the Mr. Julius Caesar contest because Hundert inflated Sedgewick’s essay grade, remembers this metaphorical wound as clearly as he remembers losing half of his leg during his time as an officer in the Korean War. 

Character

The concept of character is a key motif in the stories. The Heraclitan idea that “character is fate” is referenced in all the stories except for “City of Broken Hearts.” Much like a Shakespearean tragedy, the protagonists’ tragic flaws influence the outcome of events. Roth, from the outset of his story, reflects on his misdeed of stealing the leggings and decides that “this flaw is so large that it cannot properly be called a flaw but my character itself” (1). Roth attributes his misdemeanor less to a random whim than to his internal disposition, which has “always felt the impulse for uproar and disorder” (61). This trait is evident in other life events as well, such as his last-minute choice of whimsical, extravagant Scheherazade over sensible, frugal LeAnne.

Additionally, his impulse to attend the baseball camp in the first place, despite his wife’s advice and his own judgement, also fuels his destructive side. However, Roth’s character alone does not determine the course of events. For example, Roth had no influence over Peters’s success or the fact that Willie Mays cannot overlook Roth’s gaffe and automatically rewards an undeserving Peters with Most Valuable Player. Chances are, had those two factors been different, Roth’s actions and perhaps even his perceptions of his character might have varied as well. Arguably, Roth’s inability to comprehend the success of Peters, a “lazy scoundrel [he] knew as a boy” (55), stems from his rigid notion of character as being both fixed and a marker of destiny.

Wilson also considers that he has a defined character, that is conventionally masculine and suited to matrimony and loyalty. Unlike Roth, Wilson does not consider that he hides his true character from people, although his grief over his lost marriage causes him to feel that “there was a part of him he no longer controlled, a ruinous version of himself that brought up memories go his old life as soon as he was ready to embark on a new one” (165). While Wilson struggles to control this part of his character, which would have him forever grieving the past, his son Brent pressures him to change his nature, especially with regard to his attitude to women. To earn a relationship with Margaret and return to the familiarity of being in a committed relationship, Wilson must learn how to adapt with the times and release himself from his rigid notion of what comprises a strong sense of character.

Rigid notions of character are most present in “The Palace Thief,” where the fact that character is destiny is proven by Hundert and Sedgewick’s nearly identical performances in Mr. Julius Caesar tournaments that are 40 years apart. Sedgewick merely updates his manner of cheating; Hundert again allows the transgression while throws a curveball to ensure Mehta, the conscientious, rule-abiding competitor, wins. The men’s tendency to stick to a fixed notion of their character has different results. Sedgewick’s enables him to succeed in business and politics, while Hundert’s inhibits his promotion to the role of headmaster.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 40 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools