logo

50 pages 1 hour read

The Jungle Book

Fiction | Short Story Collection | Middle Grade | Published in 1894

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Social Hierarchy of Empire

Content Warning: This section of the guide contains discussions of racism.

Throughout the stories in The Jungle Book, Rudyard Kipling explores the notion of social hierarchy through the relationships between humans and animals. In these stories, animal species create their own social systems, such as the Law of the Jungle or the Rules of the Beach, which determine leadership, status, and behavioral restrictions. Many of the stories in which humans interact with animals demonstrate that human wisdom sets mankind above animals, making them the natural “masters” of animals. However, animals are much more physically powerful than humans, necessitating that humans ally with certain animals such as wolves, buffalo, mongooses, or elephants, in order to overpower dangerous foes such as tigers, snakes, and other humans during military conflicts.

The submission of animals to humans is a notion drawn from the Christian Bible with which Rudyard Kipling would have been familiar. When God creates Adam and Eve, they are told: “[R]ule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground” (Genesis 1:28). Kipling expresses a similar concept in “Her Majesty’s Servants,” in which the animals used by the Anglo-Indian army are below the human soldiers in the chain of military command. However, by anthropomorphizing the animals, Kipling presents a moral in his fable-like stories that humans must obey their rulers as domesticated animals obey humans. When the Central Asian chief in “Her Majesty’s Servants” asks how the Anglo-Indian army was able to put on such an impressive animal parade, an officer responds, “There was an order, and they obeyed,” prompting the chief to ask, “but are the beasts as wise as the men?” (299). The obedience of the animals serves to make them more like humans, rather than less. Their capacity to participate in a human institution like the military suggests that humans and animals are not two separate societies, but rather one complex social system that encompasses many species, each with their own innate talents, abilities, and status.

The song at the end of “Toomai of the Elephants,” “Shiv and the Grasshopper,”  encapsulates this perspective on human and animal hierarchy. Kipling co-opts the Hindu deity Shiva to express how all living creatures are bound together in a natural order. In the song, Shiv protects and feeds people at all levels of human society, but the song transitions seamlessly to show how he also feeds the appropriate diet to each species of animal: “Wheat he gave to rich folk, millet to the poor, Broken scraps for holy men that beg from door to door; Cattle to the tiger, carrion to the kite, And rags and bones to wicked wolves without the wall at night” (262). Shiv allots different foods to humans and animal species, downplaying the differences between human and animal life while simultaneously suggesting that the differences between types of people and species of animals cause them to live in a natural hierarchy. The rich eat wheat while the poor eat millet, just as the tiger eats cattle while the humble grasshopper only eats a leaf.

The concept of hierarchy in The Jungle Book metaphorically parallels British colonial ideology. Kipling’s portrayal of how humans and animals are connected and yet not equal in status and natural ability maps onto his racist ideology of the “White Man’s Burden.” Rather than living in separate communities with different rules, Kipling suggests that the English and the Indian population must work together to best serve the interests of the British Empire. Indian people must submit to those of superior wisdom, Kipling implies, who are their white, British leaders.

Adoption and Maternal Love

Adoption into another species or culture occurs throughout The Jungle Book, demonstrating how love and kindness can overcome differences in lineage, but sometimes causing pain and confusion in the character caught between cultural identities. Kipling may have drawn this from his own experience—he was born to English parents but raised in India and then sent to England for his education, meaning that he was cared for by many people other than his parents who came from a wide variety of cultures. Kipling expressed a love for India—though his racist and colonialist ideas must be taken into account here—but he felt alienated in England due to the cruelty of his caretakers there. Similarly, the character of Mowgli is adopted by the people of the jungle, but experiences rejection from both his human and animal homes, causing him pain and confusion. Rikki-tikki-tavi also finds himself adopted into a different society than the one in which he was raised when he is rescued by an English family, and Little Toomai is welcomed into the community of foresters despite his father’s wish that he carry on the family tradition of elephant driving.

The love and kindness of adoptive parents, particularly maternal figures, allows these interspecies adoptions to succeed and overcome natural differences. When Mowgli wanders into the wolf cave as a baby in “Mowgli’s Brothers,” it is Raksha, the mother wolf, who advocates for his adoption. She wants to keep him because she loves his bravery, telling her mate, “[H]e came naked, by night, alone and very hungry; yet he was not afraid! Look, he has pushed one of my babes to one side already” (14). When Mowgli goes to the human village in “Tiger! Tiger!”, it is a woman named Messua who becomes his caretaker because she loves his resemblance to her son Nathoo, who was taken by Shere Khan. While she seems to understand that Mowgli is not Nathoo, she still shows him kindness. Her love for Mowgli cannot protect him from being cast out of the village, but it does prevent Mowgli from taking revenge against the humans. He tells them as he leaves, “[T]hank Messua that I do not come in with my wolves and hunt you up and down your street” (125). Mowgli’s two maternal figures enable him to join the jungle and village societies, and they give him a lingering loyalty to these places even when he is cast out from them. This thematic treatment of maternal love reflects the fact that Kipling was writing for children, since it presents a comforting yet moralistic idea about family loyalty.

Likewise, in “Rikki-tikki-tavi,” the bravery of the titular mongoose causes the human family to love him, and this mutual love enables their successful interspecies alliance against the snakes. After Teddy and his parents rescue Rikki-tikki-tavi from the flood, dry him off, and feed him, the mongoose helps and protects them in return. Notably, it is Teddy’s mother whom Rikki-tikki-tavi must win over in order to find full acceptance at the end of the story. Initially, Teddy’s mother does not trust the mongoose to sleep beside her son, worrying to her husband that “he may bite the child” (179). However, after Rikki-tikki-tavi protects the family from cobras, she is no longer concerned that he sleeps on Teddy’s pillow and cries over him when he returns from fighting Nagaina.

All of the female characters in The Jungle Book are mothers, and maternal love is depicted as a powerful motivating force upon the young male protagonists. Even the antagonist, Nagaina, is driven by her wish to protect her eggs and raise her children as the dominant species in the garden. While stories such as “The White Seal” and “Toomai of the Elephants” depict father-son relationships as complex and sometimes antagonistic, maternal figures consistently provide comfort and support to the young male protagonists. Kipling portrays maternal love as one of the only bonds strong enough to overcome differences in culture and species.

Childhood Versus Civilization

Childhood in The Jungle Book is a condition that exists outside of, and often opposed to, civilization, resulting in child characters who question the rules of their society as they learn them. Childhood is presented as both dangerous—a time of vulnerability and foolish behavior—but also desirable—a state of innocence that can subvert corrupt practices. Mowgli’s childhood is spent in the jungle, but he nevertheless must spend most of his time learning the laws of the animals and how to communicate with various species. His rebellion against his teacher, Baloo, in “Kaa’s Hunting,” causes him to be kidnapped by the monkey people who exist outside of jungle society because they refuse to follow its rules. The monkeys exist in a state of perpetual childhood in this story world because they do not follow any rules, but Mowgli quickly grows tired of their company when he realizes that this lack of organization means that they forget to bring him food and spend all of their time bragging. Baloo’s teachings emphasize that childhood is a precarious and vulnerable state, and that rules exist to protect the young. In his maxims at the beginning of “Kaa’s Hunting,” Baloo teaches that “the Jungle is large and the Cub he is small. Let him think and be still” (46). While the Law of the Jungle protects cubs from being attacked by other predators, it is still a dangerously wild state that necessitates a good education in order for the child to survive to adulthood.

Childhood’s wildness in the stories can also usefully expose the flaws of a civilization’s rules. When Mowgli goes to live in the human village in “Tiger! Tiger!”, he must learn a new set of rules in order to fit into human society. However, because of his youth and upbringing, he does not understand many human cultural practices. The childlike perspective of Mowgli allows Kipling to critique rules that humans create. When he joins the village, Mowgli finds that “first he had to wear a cloth round him, which annoyed him horribly; and then he had to learn about money, which he did not in the least understand, and about plowing, of which he did not see the use” (101). Most notably, Mowgli does not understand the caste system and helps a potter who is struggling to climb a hill, earning him the ire of the village priest. By exposing the absurdity of these rules through Mowgli’s perspective, Kipling suggests that some rules of human civilization are irrational and should be changed.

In “The White Seal,” Kotick’s status as a child allows him the freedom to explore and find alternatives to flawed systems within his society. Because Kotick does not yet have a mate and children to support, he is able to spend his time searching the sea for a better island where the seals will be able to live without the threat of human hunters. His youthful perspective means that he does not accept that this undesirable relationship between humans and seals is the way it will always be. While Kotick becomes an adult seal physically, he remains in a childlike state for longer than normal due to his quest. His mother wants him to accept adulthood; she “begged him to marry and settle down, for he was no longer a holluschick, but a full-grown sea-catch, with a curly white mane on his shoulders, as heavy, as big, and as fierce as his father” (160). However, Kotick asks to avoid taking a mate for another season so that he has one last chance to explore the ocean. Kotick’s extended childhood proves beneficial for the seals, allowing him to discover new ways of living, but in the end, he must take on an adult role by marrying and fighting on the beach like the other mature seals. Just as Mowgli’s eventual marriage signals the end of childhood, Kotick’s marriage is tied to his coming-of-age and the end of his period of exploration and discovery.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 50 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools